ICAP vs. FFRHX
ICAP (Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both funds - ICAP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by InfraCap, while FFRHX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ICAP returned 15.47%/yr vs 6.51%/yr for FFRHX. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ICAP charges 2.47%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.
Performance
ICAP vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICAP achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 2.14% return.
ICAP
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.08%
FFRHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $705.93K | $687.44K | $943.59K |
ICAP vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICAP Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF | 8.65% | 15.77% | 14.83% | 8.82% | -10.10% | 1.08% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 2.14% | 5.47% | 7.10% | 12.63% | -1.55% | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICAP and FFRHX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2021 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ICAP and FFRHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICAP vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank
ICAP
FFRHX
ICAP vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF (ICAP) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICAP | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.81 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 4.51 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | 14.73 | -8.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICAP vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICAP drawdown since its inception was -24.20%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAP and FFRHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICAP | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.20% | -22.20% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -1.19% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.31% | -3.29% | -17.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.11% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -1.14% | -6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 0.36% | +2.46% |
Volatility
ICAP vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison
Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF (ICAP) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.22%. This indicates that ICAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICAP | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 0.22% | +3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.52% | 1.69% | +8.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.55% | 2.34% | +11.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 2.89% | +15.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 4.13% | +13.93% |
ICAP vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICAP has a 2.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICAP vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison
ICAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%, more than FFRHX's 6.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 6.39% | 7.41% | 6.94% | 8.24% | 3.81% | 2.74% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 4.74% | 4.05% | 4.44% | 3.69% |
ICAP Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF | 9.93% | 8.89% | 8.30% | 8.65% | 8.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICAP and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICAP has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to FFRHX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICAP dropped -24.20% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.
FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICAP and FFRHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer