IBUY vs. PEJ
IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - IBUY tracks the EQM Online Retail Index while PEJ tracks the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBUY returned 11.07%/yr vs 7.66%/yr for PEJ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PEJ.
Performance
IBUY vs. PEJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBUY achieves a -9.12% return, which is significantly lower than PEJ's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IBUY has outperformed PEJ with an annualized return of 11.07%, while PEJ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.66% annualized return.
IBUY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- -12.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
PEJ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 18.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
IBUY vs. PEJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | -9.12% | 15.26% | 20.14% | 38.01% | -55.71% | -22.99% | 123.79% | 28.47% | -1.93% | 50.27% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 6.49% | 17.78% | 25.08% | 15.73% | -25.37% | 22.78% | -10.29% | 13.82% | -9.31% | 11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUY and PEJ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2016 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IBUY and PEJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
IBUY vs. PEJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBUY
PEJ
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBUY
PEJ
Communication Services
IBUY
PEJ
Technology
IBUY
PEJ
Financial Services
IBUY
PEJ
Healthcare
IBUY
PEJ
-
Industrials
IBUY
PEJ
Consumer Defensive
IBUY
PEJ
Real Estate
IBUY
PEJ
-
Basic Materials
IBUY
-
PEJ
-
Energy
IBUY
-
PEJ
-
Utilities
IBUY
-
PEJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUY vs. PEJ — Risk / Return Rank
IBUY
PEJ
IBUY vs. PEJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBUY | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.19 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 1.85 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 4.80 | -4.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBUY vs. PEJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, which is greater than PEJ's maximum drawdown of -66.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and PEJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUY | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.00% | -66.03% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -10.29% | -12.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -25.75% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.15% | -34.74% | -36.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.00% | -58.96% | -14.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.33% | -0.76% | -50.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.75% | -12.29% | -17.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.99% | 3.97% | +7.02% |
Volatility
IBUY vs. PEJ - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) at 4.58%. This indicates that IBUY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUY | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 4.58% | +2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.52% | 14.18% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 18.44% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.13% | 22.77% | +9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.18% | 24.73% | +4.45% |
IBUY vs. PEJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PEJ's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBUY vs. PEJ - Dividend Comparison
IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than PEJ's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.51% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUY and PEJ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBUY has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to PEJ (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUY dropped -73.00% vs PEJ's -66.03%.
On 10-year performance, IBUY leads with 11.07% vs 7.66% for PEJ. On fees, PEJ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PEJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IBUY has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEJ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.
PEJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.
IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.55% for PEJ.
PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBUY and PEJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer