IBUY vs. GAMR
IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBUY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the EQM Online Retail Index, while GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBUY returned 10.38%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for GAMR. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GAMR.
Performance
IBUY vs. GAMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBUY achieves a -10.92% return, which is significantly lower than GAMR's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IBUY has underperformed GAMR with an annualized return of 10.38%, while GAMR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.
IBUY
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -10.92%
- 6M
- -10.14%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- -11.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
GAMR
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 13.55%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
IBUY vs. GAMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | -10.92% | 15.26% | 20.14% | 38.01% | -55.71% | -22.99% | 123.79% | 28.47% | -1.93% | 50.27% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 3.68% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -36.96% | 11.31% | 76.83% | 14.76% | -18.82% | 59.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUY and GAMR is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IBUY and GAMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IBUY vs. GAMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBUY
GAMR
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBUY
GAMR
Communication Services
IBUY
GAMR
Technology
IBUY
GAMR
Industrials
IBUY
GAMR
-
Healthcare
IBUY
GAMR
-
Financial Services
IBUY
GAMR
Consumer Defensive
IBUY
GAMR
-
Real Estate
IBUY
GAMR
-
Basic Materials
IBUY
-
GAMR
-
Energy
IBUY
-
GAMR
-
Utilities
IBUY
-
GAMR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUY vs. GAMR — Risk / Return Rank
IBUY
GAMR
IBUY vs. GAMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBUY | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | 0.89 | -1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | 1.30 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.17 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.68 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 1.55 | -1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBUY | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 0.89 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | -0.02 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.53 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.58 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
IBUY vs. GAMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, which is greater than GAMR's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and GAMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUY | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.00% | -55.37% | -17.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -29.36% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -29.36% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.15% | -50.57% | -20.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.00% | -55.37% | -17.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.29% | -13.61% | -38.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -22.13% | -7.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.50% | 12.82% | -2.32% |
Volatility
IBUY vs. GAMR - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) have volatilities of 5.60% and 5.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUY | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 5.88% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | 17.37% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 22.32% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.07% | 24.35% | +7.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.16% | 24.27% | +4.89% |
IBUY vs. GAMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GAMR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBUY vs. GAMR - Dividend Comparison
IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than GAMR's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUY and GAMR have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAMR has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to IBUY (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUY dropped -73.00% vs GAMR's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, GAMR leads with 12.82% vs 10.38% for IBUY. On fees, GAMR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, IBUY has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GAMR has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GAMR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.
GAMR has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.
IBUY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while GAMR is Gaming. IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.59% for GAMR.
GAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBUY and GAMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer