IBUY vs. BLOK
IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBUY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the EQM Online Retail Index, while BLOK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. IBUY is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBUY returned -11.36%/yr vs 11.96%/yr for BLOK. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BLOK.
Performance
IBUY vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBUY achieves a -10.92% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 16.21% return.
IBUY
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -10.92%
- 6M
- -10.14%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- -11.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
BLOK
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 51.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
IBUY vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | -10.92% | 15.26% | 20.14% | 38.01% | -55.71% | -22.99% | 123.79% | 28.47% | -7.86% |
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 16.21% | 32.64% | 53.12% | 99.62% | -62.36% | 30.76% | 90.17% | 29.54% | -25.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUY and BLOK is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IBUY and BLOK shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IBUY vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBUY
BLOK
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBUY
BLOK
Communication Services
IBUY
BLOK
Technology
IBUY
BLOK
Industrials
IBUY
BLOK
Healthcare
IBUY
BLOK
-
Financial Services
IBUY
BLOK
Consumer Defensive
IBUY
BLOK
-
Real Estate
IBUY
BLOK
Basic Materials
IBUY
-
BLOK
-
Energy
IBUY
-
BLOK
-
Utilities
IBUY
-
BLOK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUY vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank
IBUY
BLOK
IBUY vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBUY | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.16 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.87 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 1.90 | -2.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBUY | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 0.81 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.28 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.48 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
IBUY vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and BLOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUY | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.00% | -73.33% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -35.64% | +12.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -35.64% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.15% | -73.33% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.29% | -10.16% | -42.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -26.08% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.50% | 16.23% | -5.73% |
Volatility
IBUY vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) is 5.60%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that IBUY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUY | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 10.59% | -4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | 28.55% | -12.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 38.29% | -16.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.07% | 42.36% | -10.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.16% | 38.97% | -9.81% |
IBUY vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBUY vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison
IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than BLOK's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 0.62% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUY and BLOK have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to IBUY (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUY dropped -73.00% vs BLOK's -73.33%.
On 5-year performance, BLOK leads with 11.96% vs -11.36% for IBUY. On fees, IBUY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IBUY has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 11.96% return vs -11.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBUY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.
BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.
IBUY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while BLOK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.71% for BLOK.
BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBUY and BLOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer