IBTL vs. LIF
IBTL (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index, while LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, IBTL returned 3.51% vs -25.93% for LIF. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBTL vs. LIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTL achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly higher than LIF's -29.45% return.
IBTL
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LIF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- -29.45%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- -25.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTL vs. LIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | -0.37% | 7.85% | 1.43% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | -29.45% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTL and LIF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTL vs. LIF — Risk / Return Rank
IBTL
LIF
IBTL vs. LIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTL | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.97 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | -0.43 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | -0.70 | +3.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTL vs. LIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTL drawdown since its inception was -20.93%, smaller than the maximum LIF drawdown of -65.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTL and LIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTL | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.93% | -65.64% | +44.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -65.64% | +62.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.16% | -59.19% | +52.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -21.35% | +9.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 40.82% | -39.79% |
Volatility
IBTL vs. LIF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) is 1.11%, while Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a volatility of 16.67%. This indicates that IBTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTL | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 16.67% | -15.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.41% | 52.85% | -50.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 67.08% | -63.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 62.97% | -55.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 62.97% | -55.53% |
Dividends
IBTL vs. LIF - Dividend Comparison
IBTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, while LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | 3.97% | 3.93% | 4.07% | 3.04% | 2.36% | 0.70% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTL and LIF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (16.67%) compared to IBTL (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTL dropped -20.93% vs LIF's -65.64%.
IBTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTL and LIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer