PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTJ vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBTJ vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBTJ vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
0.14%6.89%1.82%4.49%1.62%
BUCK
Simplify Stable Income ETF
0.97%4.13%7.25%4.63%0.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 0.97% return.


IBTJ

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
0.14%
6M
1.32%
1Y
4.22%
3Y*
3.33%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.97%
6M
2.27%
1Y
2.66%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBTJ vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTJ has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBTJ vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTJ
IBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTJ vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTJBUCKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

0.55

+0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

0.72

+1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.12

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

0.51

+2.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.11

1.35

+6.76

IBTJ vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTJ and BUCK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTJBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.55

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

1.44

-1.45

Correlation

The correlation between IBTJ and BUCK is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IBTJ vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than BUCK's 7.57% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
3.81%3.78%3.95%3.48%1.86%0.74%0.61%
BUCK
Simplify Stable Income ETF
7.57%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBTJ vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and BUCK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTJBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-5.43%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-5.43%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.08%

-0.13%

-5.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-0.52%

-9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

2.04%

-1.51%

Volatility

IBTJ vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) has a higher volatility of 0.90% compared to Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.33%. This indicates that IBTJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBTJBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

0.33%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

1.68%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

4.83%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.77%

3.55%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.07%

3.55%

+2.52%