PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTH vs. LIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTH vs. LIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTH achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than LIF's -29.45% return.


IBTH

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.03%
6M
1.29%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*

LIF

1D
-0.07%
1M
17.44%
YTD
-29.45%
6M
-33.03%
1Y
-25.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTH vs. LIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBTH
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF
1.03%5.29%3.15%
LIF
Life360, Inc.
-29.45%55.42%58.73%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTH and LIF is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTH vs. LIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTH
IBTH Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IBTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTH Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

LIF
LIF Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIF Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIF Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTH vs. LIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTHLIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

0.97

+0.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.03

-0.43

+10.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.28

-0.70

+41.98

IBTH vs. LIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTH Sharpe Ratio is 3.74, which is higher than the LIF Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTH and LIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTH vs. LIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTH drawdown since its inception was -16.16%, smaller than the maximum LIF drawdown of -65.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTH and LIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTHLIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-65.64%

+49.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.38%

-65.64%

+65.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-59.19%

+57.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-21.35%

+14.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.09%

40.82%

-40.73%

Volatility

IBTH vs. LIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) is 0.20%, while Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a volatility of 16.67%. This indicates that IBTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTHLIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

16.67%

-16.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.54%

52.85%

-52.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03%

67.08%

-66.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.19%

62.97%

-58.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

62.97%

-58.77%

Dividends

IBTH vs. LIF - Dividend Comparison

IBTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, while LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBTH
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF
3.82%3.92%4.04%3.61%2.00%0.77%0.50%
LIF
Life360, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTH and LIF have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIF has higher volatility (16.67%) compared to IBTH (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTH dropped -16.16% vs LIF's -65.64%.

IBTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTH and LIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer