IBTG vs. IVV
IBTG (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTG is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBTG returned 0.84%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for IVV. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. IBTG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
IBTG vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTG achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return.
IBTG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
IBTG vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 1.44% | 4.40% | 3.97% | 4.34% | -8.18% | -3.04% | 3.99% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 29.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTG and IVV is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | -0.02 |
The correlation between IBTG and IVV shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTG vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
IBTG
IVV
IBTG vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +17.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.40 | 1.43 | +2.97 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 63.59 | 3.17 | +60.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 256.63 | 14.71 | +241.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.02 | 2.39 | +5.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.83 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.45 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
IBTG vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTG drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -55.25% | +41.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.07% | -8.89% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.33% | -18.75% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.31% | -24.53% | +12.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.76% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -10.78% | +5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 1.91% | -1.89% |
Volatility
IBTG vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) is 0.12%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that IBTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.12% | 2.87% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.32% | 8.90% | -8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52% | 11.80% | -11.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.27% | 16.88% | -13.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.45% | 18.05% | -14.60% |
IBTG vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTG vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 3.96% | 4.03% | 4.08% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.66% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTG and IVV have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to IBTG (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTG dropped -13.62% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.88% vs 0.84% for IBTG. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IBTG has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.88% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTG.
IBTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.
IBTG is categorized as Government Bonds, while IVV is S&P 500. IBTG tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTG and 0.03% for IVV.
IBTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.02 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTG and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer