IBTG vs. BSCQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ).
IBTG and BSCQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. BSCQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2016. Both IBTG and BSCQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBTG or BSCQ.
Correlation
The correlation between IBTG and BSCQ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IBTG vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IBTG:
4.12
BSCQ:
4.32
IBTG:
7.23
BSCQ:
7.18
IBTG:
2.00
BSCQ:
2.05
IBTG:
0.74
BSCQ:
1.37
IBTG:
23.22
BSCQ:
41.04
IBTG:
0.26%
BSCQ:
0.16%
IBTG:
1.48%
BSCQ:
1.49%
IBTG:
-13.62%
BSCQ:
-16.50%
IBTG:
-2.65%
BSCQ:
0.00%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBTG having a 1.47% return and BSCQ slightly higher at 1.50%.
IBTG
1.47%
0.50%
2.08%
6.08%
-0.29%
N/A
BSCQ
1.50%
0.29%
2.00%
6.44%
1.84%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTG vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBTG vs. BSCQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IBTG
BSCQ
IBTG vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBTG vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than BSCQ's 4.14% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 4.08% | 4.08% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.66% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 3.19% | 3.33% | 2.92% | 0.69% |
Drawdowns
IBTG vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTG drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG and BSCQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBTG vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) is 0.38%, while Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) has a volatility of 0.57%. This indicates that IBTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.