PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBND vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBND vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBND achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IBND has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 0.65%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.


IBND

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
-1.08%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
-1.50%
10Y*
0.65%

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBND vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF
-1.08%16.17%-2.81%10.38%-19.44%-8.40%11.50%4.41%-6.15%14.84%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IBND and YCS is -0.67, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2010

-0.45

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IBND and YCS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.45 to -0.67, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBND vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBND
IBND Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBND Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBND Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBND vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBNDYCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.36

1.92

-1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.58

2.44

-1.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.97

-3.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.16

12.40

-11.23

IBND vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBND and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBNDYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

1.92

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

1.12

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.65

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.33

-0.18

Drawdowns

IBND vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBND drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBND and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBNDYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-49.56%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-8.30%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.18%

-23.05%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-27.32%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.62%

-27.32%

-8.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.45%

0.00%

-9.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-19.93%

+9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.66%

-0.20%

Volatility

IBND vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) is 2.04%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that IBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBNDYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

2.75%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

12.32%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.97%

17.27%

-9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.74%

21.10%

-11.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.94%

19.01%

-10.07%

IBND vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBND vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

IBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF
2.74%2.49%2.61%2.08%0.54%0.38%0.45%0.67%0.71%0.34%0.01%0.01%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBND and YCS have a correlation of -0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to IBND (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBND dropped -35.62% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.34% vs 0.65% for IBND. On fees, IBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IBND has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 0.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

IBND has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

IBND is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. IBND tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBND and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBND and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer