IBMR vs. TAXI
IBMR (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF) and TAXI (Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - IBMR tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index while TAXI tracks the ICE Intermediate Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBMR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXI.
Performance
IBMR vs. TAXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMR achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than TAXI's 0.97% return.
IBMR
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAXI
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMR vs. TAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.71% | 0.89% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.97% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMR and TAXI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMR vs. TAXI — Risk / Return Rank
IBMR
TAXI
IBMR vs. TAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBMR | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMR | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 2.95 | -2.02 |
Drawdowns
IBMR vs. TAXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMR drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, which is greater than TAXI's maximum drawdown of -2.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMR and TAXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMR | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -2.23% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.77% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -0.46% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | — | — |
Volatility
IBMR vs. TAXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMR | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75% | 1.90% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 1.90% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 1.90% | +1.17% |
IBMR vs. TAXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXI's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBMR vs. TAXI - Dividend Comparison
IBMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than TAXI's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.55% | 2.55% | 2.53% | 1.27% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.00% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMR and TAXI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMR.
IBMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.00% for TAXI.
IBMR tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index, while TAXI tracks ICE Intermediate Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMR and 0.05% for TAXI.
Find the right allocation for IBMR and TAXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer