TAXI vs. GUMI
TAXI (Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and GUMI (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. TAXI is passively managed, while GUMI is actively managed. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TAXI charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for GUMI.
Performance
TAXI vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAXI achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than GUMI's 1.64% return.
TAXI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GUMI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 2.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $786.42K | $993.70K | $665.44K | |
| $829.70K | $728.87K | $911.81K |
TAXI vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | -0.04% | 3.35% |
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 1.64% | 1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAXI and GUMI is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAXI vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank
TAXI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GUMI
TAXI vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAXI | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.62 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 36.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAXI vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAXI drawdown since its inception was -2.23%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXI and GUMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAXI | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -0.48% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | 0.00% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -0.05% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility
TAXI vs. GUMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAXI | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95% | 1.04% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 0.98% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 0.98% | +0.97% |
TAXI vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAXI has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TAXI vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison
TAXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than GUMI's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 2.67% | 2.95% | 1.37% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.51% | 0.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAXI and GUMI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for GUMI.
GUMI has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.51% for TAXI.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TAXI and 0.16% for GUMI.
Find the right allocation for TAXI and GUMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer