IBMR vs. PLTG
IBMR (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF) and PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index, while PLTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. IBMR is passively managed, while PLTG is actively managed. Over the past year, IBMR returned 3.45% vs -54.35% for PLTG. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. IBMR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PLTG.
Performance
IBMR vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMR achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than PLTG's -65.23% return.
IBMR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTG
- 1D
- -4.81%
- 1M
- -30.69%
- YTD
- -65.23%
- 6M
- -71.20%
- 1Y
- -54.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMR vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.79% | 4.50% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | -65.23% | 100.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMR and PLTG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMR vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank
IBMR
PLTG
IBMR vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBMR | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.96 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | -0.71 | +2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | -1.26 | +6.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBMR vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMR drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum PLTG drawdown of -76.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMR and PLTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMR | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -76.37% | +71.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.55% | -76.37% | +74.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -76.37% | +75.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -32.02% | +31.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 43.16% | -42.56% |
Volatility
IBMR vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) is 0.39%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a volatility of 38.03%. This indicates that IBMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMR | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 38.03% | -37.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.15% | 78.49% | -77.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76% | 102.77% | -101.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.04% | 105.82% | -102.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.04% | 105.82% | -102.78% |
IBMR vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBMR vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison
IBMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than PLTG's 52.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.55% | 2.55% | 2.53% | 1.27% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | 52.16% | 18.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMR and PLTG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTG has higher volatility (38.03%) compared to IBMR (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMR dropped -4.83% vs PLTG's -76.37%.
On 1-year performance, IBMR leads with 3.45% vs -54.35% for PLTG. On fees, IBMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBMR has performed better with a 3.45% return vs -54.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PLTG.
PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 52.16%, compared with 2.55% for IBMR.
IBMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PLTG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMR and 0.75% for PLTG.
IBMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBMR and PLTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer