IBMR vs. MKTN
IBMR (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF) and MKTN (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index, while MKTN is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Federated Hermes. IBMR is passively managed, while MKTN is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
IBMR vs. MKTN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMR achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than MKTN's 1.15% return.
IBMR
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MKTN
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMR vs. MKTN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.71% | 0.42% |
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF | 1.15% | 3.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMR and MKTN is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMR vs. MKTN — Risk / Return Rank
IBMR
MKTN
IBMR vs. MKTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBMR | MKTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMR | MKTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.04 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
IBMR vs. MKTN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMR drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, which is greater than MKTN's maximum drawdown of -4.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMR and MKTN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMR | MKTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -4.13% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.76% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -1.14% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | — | — |
Volatility
IBMR vs. MKTN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMR | MKTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75% | 6.83% | -5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 6.83% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 6.83% | -3.76% |
Dividends
IBMR vs. MKTN - Dividend Comparison
IBMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than MKTN's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.55% | 2.55% | 2.53% | 1.27% |
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMR and MKTN have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.50% for MKTN.
IBMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while MKTN is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Federated Hermes.
Find the right allocation for IBMR and MKTN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer