IBMR vs. SLJY
IBMR (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF) and SLJY (Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index, while SLJY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. IBMR is passively managed, while SLJY is actively managed. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IBMR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SLJY.
Performance
IBMR vs. SLJY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMR achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than SLJY's -6.46% return.
IBMR
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 1.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.61%
SLJY
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -14.62%
- YTD
- -6.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.30M | $1.37M | $1.46M | |
| $651.01K | $615.96K | $1.24M |
IBMR vs. SLJY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.49% | 0.98% |
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | -6.46% | 42.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMR and SLJY is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMR vs. SLJY — Risk / Return Rank
IBMR
SLJY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBMR vs. SLJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBMR | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.67 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBMR vs. SLJY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMR drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum SLJY drawdown of -35.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMR and SLJY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMR | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -35.19% | +30.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -31.96% | +31.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -13.17% | +12.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | — | — |
Volatility
IBMR vs. SLJY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMR | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62% | 49.04% | -47.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.00% | 49.04% | -46.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.00% | 49.04% | -46.04% |
IBMR vs. SLJY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SLJY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBMR vs. SLJY - Dividend Comparison
IBMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than SLJY's 24.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.54% | 2.55% | 2.53% | 1.27% |
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | 24.30% | 6.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMR and SLJY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SLJY.
SLJY has the higher dividend yield at 24.30%, compared with 2.54% for IBMR.
IBMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SLJY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMR and 0.75% for SLJY.
Find the right allocation for IBMR and SLJY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer