PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBMP vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBMP vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBMP achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.04% return.


IBMP

1D
0.04%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.30%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
0.60%
10Y*

DBE

1D
-2.52%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
79.04%
6M
69.31%
1Y
81.31%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMP vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBMP
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.93%3.52%1.26%3.49%-6.09%-0.16%6.22%4.88%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.04%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%-2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IBMP and DBE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBMP vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMP
IBMP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IBMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBMP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IBMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBMP Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMP vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBMPDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.39

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.10

5.67

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.14

11.08

+3.06

IBMP vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBMP Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBMP and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBMPDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.33

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.65

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.09

+0.29

Drawdowns

IBMP vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMP drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMP and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMPDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

-86.69%

+71.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.59%

-14.41%

+13.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.63%

-23.89%

+21.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.00%

-38.74%

+28.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-32.03%

+32.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.72%

-57.30%

+54.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

7.37%

-7.16%

Volatility

IBMP vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) is 0.27%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that IBMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBMPDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.27%

13.05%

-12.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.79%

30.97%

-30.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08%

35.07%

-33.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.56%

29.41%

-26.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

28.34%

-23.34%

IBMP vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBMP vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

IBMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than DBE's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.16%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
IBMP
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF
2.50%2.47%2.35%2.05%1.26%0.86%1.16%1.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBMP and DBE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to IBMP (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMP dropped -15.24% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 19.05% vs 0.60% for IBMP. On fees, IBMP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMP has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 19.05% return vs 0.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBMP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

IBMP has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 2.16% for DBE.

IBMP is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. IBMP tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Callable Factor Adjusted 2027 Series Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMP and 0.78% for DBE.

IBMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBMP and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer