PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBMP vs. PUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBMP vs. PUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBMP vs. PUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBMP
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.62%3.52%1.91%
PUSH
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF
0.64%4.16%1.74%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBMP having a 0.62% return and PUSH slightly higher at 0.64%.


IBMP

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.62%
6M
1.12%
1Y
3.16%
3Y*
2.33%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*

PUSH

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.46%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBMP vs. PUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PUSH's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IBMP vs. PUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMP
IBMP Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IBMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBMP Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBMP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PUSH
PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMP vs. PUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBMPPUSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.22

2.27

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.10

3.31

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.61

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.34

-1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.75

15.34

-4.59

IBMP vs. PUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBMP Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the PUSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBMP and PUSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBMPPUSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.27

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

2.84

-2.46

Correlation

The correlation between IBMP and PUSH is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IBMP vs. PUSH - Dividend Comparison

IBMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than PUSH's 3.60% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBMP
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF
2.48%2.47%2.35%2.05%1.26%0.86%1.16%1.06%
PUSH
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF
3.60%3.45%1.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBMP vs. PUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMP drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, which is greater than PUSH's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMP and PUSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMPPUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

-0.85%

-14.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.26%

-0.85%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.37%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-0.11%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

0.24%

+0.06%

Volatility

IBMP vs. PUSH - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) at 0.23%. This indicates that IBMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBMPPUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

0.23%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.83%

1.08%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43%

1.64%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.57%

1.33%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.07%

1.33%

+3.74%