IBIT vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIT returned -40.63% vs 27.91% for NUKZ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NUKZ.

Performance

IBIT vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.41% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 7.57% return.

IBIT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -20.12%
• YTD: -27.41%
• 6M: -29.61%
• 1Y: -40.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUKZ

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -5.07%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 4.81%
• 1Y: 27.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIT vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-27.41%	-6.41%	137.68%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	7.57%	56.57%	60.11%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIT and NUKZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024	0.42

Return for Risk

IBIT vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 3
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 31
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIT vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBIT	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	0.92	-1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.30	1.43	-2.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.17	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	1.70	-2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	4.11	-5.49

IBIT vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIT and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBIT vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBIT	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.11%	-33.03%	-19.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.11%	-16.51%	-35.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.45%	-10.39%	-39.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.53%	-6.06%	-10.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.64%	6.80%	+22.84%

Volatility

IBIT vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a higher volatility of 12.07% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 11.24%. This indicates that IBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBIT	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.07%	11.24%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.45%	23.34%	+11.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.10%	30.46%	+13.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.26%	32.94%	+17.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.26%	32.94%	+17.32%

IBIT vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBIT vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.85%	0.91%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBIT and NUKZ in my portfolio?

IBIT and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBIT or NUKZ?

IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to NUKZ (11.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -52.11% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which ETF is better, IBIT or NUKZ?

On 1-year performance, NUKZ leads with 27.91% vs -40.63% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NUKZ has been the lower-risk option at 11.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBIT or NUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, NUKZ has performed better with a 27.91% return vs -40.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBIT or NUKZ?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBIT or NUKZ?

NUKZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between IBIT and NUKZ?

IBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.