IBIH vs. TLT
IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIH is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIH returned 5.49% vs 4.93% for TLT. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBIH charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
IBIH vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIH achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.
IBIH
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -6.31%
- 10Y*
- -1.66%
IBIH vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 1.68% | 8.47% | 1.73% | 4.60% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.27% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 10.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIH and TLT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IBIH and TLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIH vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
IBIH
TLT
IBIH vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.09 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 0.65 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 1.63 | +9.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 0.51 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.26 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
IBIH vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIH and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -48.35% | +44.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.70% | -7.58% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -40.44% | +39.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -13.82% | +12.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 3.04% | -2.54% |
Volatility
IBIH vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) is 0.85%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that IBIH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 2.76% | -1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.09% | 6.50% | -4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16% | 9.77% | -6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 15.87% | -10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 14.91% | -9.98% |
IBIH vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIH vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
IBIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 3.90% | 4.68% | 4.34% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.59% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIH and TLT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLT has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to IBIH (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIH dropped -3.94% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 1-year performance, IBIH leads with 5.49% vs 4.93% for TLT. On fees, IBIH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIH has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIH has performed better with a 5.49% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 3.90% for IBIH.
IBIH is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while TLT is Government Bonds. IBIH tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIH and 0.15% for TLT.
IBIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIH and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer