PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IBIH vs. TIPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IBIH vs. TIPB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) and TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. IBIH is passively managed, while TIPB is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

IBIH vs. TIPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIH achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than TIPB's 1.05% return.

IBIH

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.85%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

TIPB

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.16%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIH vs. TIPB - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF		0.73%1.26%
TIPB
Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF		1.05%0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIH and TIPB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF

Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF

Often compared with IBIH:
IBIH vs. IBIIIBIH vs. WIPIBIH vs. IBICIBIH vs. IBIDIBIH vs. JCPIIBIH vs. CPIIIBIH vs. VTIP
Often compared with TIPB:
TIPB vs. IBIITIPB vs. ESGTIPB vs. IBICTIPB vs. CPIITIPB vs. DRLLTIPB vs. IBIDTIPB vs. EVLN

Return for Risk

IBIH vs. TIPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IBIH
IBIH Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IBIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIH Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIH Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
TIPB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIH vs. TIPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IBIHTIPBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.18

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.76

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

—

—

IBIH vs. TIPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIH vs. TIPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, which is greater than TIPB's maximum drawdown of -1.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIH and TIPB.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IBIHTIPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-1.32%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.10%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-0.38%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

—

—

Volatility

IBIH vs. TIPB - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IBIHTIPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

2.65%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.94%

2.65%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

2.65%

+2.29%

Dividends

IBIH vs. TIPB - Dividend Comparison

IBIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than TIPB's 3.04% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF		3.93%4.68%4.34%0.70%
TIPB
Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF		3.04%1.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.94, IBIH and TIPB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 3.04% for TIPB.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIH and TIPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer