IBIG vs. XDIV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBIG (iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF) and XDIV (Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIG is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while XDIV is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Roundhill. IBIG is passively managed, while XDIV is actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIG charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDIV.

Performance

IBIG vs. XDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV's 10.63% return.

IBIG

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 5.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDIV

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.14%
• YTD: 10.63%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIG vs. XDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF	1.64%	2.20%
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF	10.63%	9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIG and XDIV is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025	0.10

Return for Risk

IBIG vs. XDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIG

IBIG Risk / Return Rank: 66
IBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
IBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
IBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
IBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIG vs. XDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBIG	XDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.68	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBIG	XDIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	1.98	-0.55

Drawdowns

IBIG vs. XDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum XDIV drawdown of -9.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and XDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBIG	XDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.21%	-9.16%	+5.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.67%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-1.20%	+0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBIG	XDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62%	12.31%	-9.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.29%	12.31%	-8.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.29%	12.31%	-8.02%

IBIG vs. XDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IBIG vs. XDIV - Dividend Comparison

IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, while XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF	3.89%	4.70%	4.15%	0.78%
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBIG and XDIV in my portfolio?

IBIG and XDIV have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBIG or XDIV?

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBIG or XDIV?

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBIG or XDIV?

IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

What is the main difference between IBIG and XDIV?

IBIG is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while XDIV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIG and 0.09% for XDIV.