PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIG vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBIG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBIG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
0.60%7.90%2.60%4.26%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
5.77%144.66%20.89%1.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 5.77% return.


IBIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.59%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLV

1D
0.00%
1M
-16.46%
YTD
5.77%
6M
58.80%
1Y
122.46%
3Y*
45.50%
5Y*
24.10%
10Y*
16.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBIG vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBIG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIG
IBIG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIGSLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

2.16

-0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

2.23

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.40

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.82

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.67

8.70

-2.03

IBIG vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIG and SLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIGSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.16

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

0.25

+1.14

Correlation

The correlation between IBIG and SLV is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IBIG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
3.93%4.70%4.15%0.78%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBIG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and SLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIGSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-76.28%

+73.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-42.45%

+40.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-35.47%

+34.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

-44.76%

+43.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

13.77%

-13.17%

Volatility

IBIG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) is 1.01%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that IBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBIGSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

16.96%

-15.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

57.27%

-55.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

57.07%

-53.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

35.27%

-30.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.39%

31.35%

-26.96%