PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIG vs. IBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIG vs. IBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IBIG having a 1.64% return and IBIL slightly lower at 1.59%.


IBIG

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.42%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIL

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.17%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIG vs. IBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIG and IBIL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

0.79

The correlation between IBIG and IBIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIG vs. IBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIG
IBIG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIL
IBIL Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIG vs. IBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIGIBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

2.31

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

5.52

+7.15

IBIG vs. IBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the IBIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIG and IBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIGIBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.14

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

0.66

+0.77

Drawdowns

IBIG vs. IBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum IBIL drawdown of -5.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and IBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIGIBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-5.28%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-2.76%

+1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.66%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-1.48%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

1.15%

-0.75%

Volatility

IBIG vs. IBIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) is 0.62%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that IBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIGIBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

1.25%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

3.08%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62%

5.58%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

8.20%

-3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

8.20%

-3.91%

IBIG vs. IBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIG and IBIL have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIG vs. IBIL - Dividend Comparison

IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than IBIL's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
3.89%4.70%4.15%0.78%
IBIL
iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF
3.47%2.93%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIG and IBIL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIL has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to IBIG (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIG dropped -3.21% vs IBIL's -5.28%.

On 1-year performance, IBIL leads with 6.35% vs 5.02% for IBIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIL has performed better with a 6.35% return vs 5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIG and IBIL have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 3.47% for IBIL.

IBIG tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while IBIL tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury TIPS Index.

IBIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIG and IBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer