IBIL vs. PBTP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBIL (iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBIL tracks the ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury TIPS Index while PBTP tracks the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIL returned 6.35% vs 4.68% for PBTP. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBIL charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.

Performance

IBIL vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIL achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than PBTP's 2.15% return.

IBIL

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -0.33%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 6.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBTP

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 6M: 2.14%
• 1Y: 4.68%
• 3Y*: 5.23%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIL vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBIL iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF	1.59%	4.75%
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF	2.15%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIL and PBTP is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	0.65

The correlation between IBIL and PBTP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IBIL vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIL

IBIL Risk / Return Rank: 36
IBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
IBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
IBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
IBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
IBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 36

PBTP

PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 93
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIL vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBIL	PBTP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	3.05	-1.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	5.10	-3.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.66	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	7.08	-4.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.52	24.51	-18.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBIL vs. PBTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the PBTP Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIL and PBTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBIL	PBTP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	3.05	-1.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	1.30	-0.64

Drawdowns

IBIL vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIL drawdown since its inception was -5.28%, roughly equal to the maximum PBTP drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIL and PBTP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBIL	PBTP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.28%	-5.44%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-0.66%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-5.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.02%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-0.75%	-0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	0.19%	+0.96%

Volatility

IBIL vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) at 0.40%. This indicates that IBIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBIL	PBTP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	0.40%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.08%	1.03%	+2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.58%	1.54%	+4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.20%	2.85%	+5.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.20%	2.64%	+5.56%

IBIL vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIL has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IBIL vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison

IBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than PBTP's 3.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBIL iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF	3.47%	2.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF	3.10%	3.82%	2.59%	2.36%	5.33%	3.12%	1.25%	2.12%	2.33%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBIL and PBTP in my portfolio?

IBIL and PBTP have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBIL or PBTP?

IBIL has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to PBTP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIL dropped -5.28% vs PBTP's -5.44%.

Which ETF is better, IBIL or PBTP?

On 1-year performance, IBIL leads with 6.35% vs 4.68% for PBTP. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PBTP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBIL or PBTP?

Over the 1-year period, IBIL has performed better with a 6.35% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBIL or PBTP?

PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBIL or PBTP?

IBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 3.10% for PBTP.

What is the main difference between IBIL and PBTP?

IBIL tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury TIPS Index, while PBTP tracks ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIL and 0.07% for PBTP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.