IBII vs. TIPB
IBII (iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF) and TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. IBII is passively managed, while TIPB is actively managed. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
IBII vs. TIPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBII achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than TIPB's 1.32% return.
IBII
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 2.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.42%
TIPB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $334.80K | $323.00K | $347.99K | |
| $2.11K | $9.22K | $33.66K |
IBII vs. TIPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBII iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF | 0.86% | 1.35% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.32% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBII and TIPB is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBII vs. TIPB — Risk / Return Rank
IBII
TIPB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBII vs. TIPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) and Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBII | TIPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBII vs. TIPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBII drawdown since its inception was -4.65%, which is greater than TIPB's maximum drawdown of -1.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBII and TIPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBII | TIPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -1.32% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -0.85% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -0.42% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | — | — |
Volatility
IBII vs. TIPB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBII | TIPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41% | 2.60% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 2.60% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 2.60% | +2.75% |
IBII vs. TIPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBII and TIPB have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBII vs. TIPB - Dividend Comparison
IBII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than TIPB's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBII iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF | 5.21% | 4.80% | 4.76% | 1.10% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 4.16% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IBII and TIPB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBII and TIPB have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
IBII has the higher dividend yield at 5.21%, compared with 4.16% for TIPB.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust.
Find the right allocation for IBII and TIPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer