PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIG vs. IBIH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIG vs. IBIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with IBIG at 1.60% and IBIH at 1.60%.


IBIG

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.46%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIH

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.34%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIG vs. IBIH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
1.60%7.90%2.60%4.26%
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
1.60%8.47%1.73%4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIG and IBIH is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.97

The correlation between IBIG and IBIH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIG vs. IBIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIG
IBIG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIH
IBIH Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IBIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIH Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIH Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIG vs. IBIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIGIBIHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.98

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

10.16

+2.01

IBIG vs. IBIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the IBIH Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIG and IBIH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIGIBIHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.62

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

1.24

+0.19

Drawdowns

IBIG vs. IBIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum IBIH drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and IBIH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIGIBIHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-3.94%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-1.70%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.62%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-0.96%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.51%

-0.11%

Volatility

IBIG vs. IBIH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) is 0.60%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that IBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIGIBIHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

0.83%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

2.09%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61%

3.15%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.28%

4.93%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.28%

4.93%

-0.65%

IBIG vs. IBIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIG and IBIH have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIG vs. IBIH - Dividend Comparison

IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, which matches IBIH's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
3.89%4.70%4.15%0.78%
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
3.90%4.68%4.34%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IBIG and IBIH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBIH has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to IBIG (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIG dropped -3.21% vs IBIH's -3.94%.

On 1-year performance, IBIH leads with 5.04% vs 4.77% for IBIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIH has performed better with a 5.04% return vs 4.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIG and IBIH have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.89% for IBIG.

IBIG tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while IBIH tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index.

IBIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIG and IBIH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer