IBIG vs. GSUI
IBIG (iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF) and GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIG is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while GSUI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIG charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for GSUI.
Performance
IBIG vs. GSUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly higher than GSUI's -50.18% return.
IBIG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- -36.10%
- YTD
- -50.18%
- 6M
- -49.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIG vs. GSUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 0.89% | -0.18% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -50.18% | -42.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIG and GSUI is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIG vs. GSUI — Risk / Return Rank
IBIG
GSUI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIG vs. GSUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIG | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIG vs. GSUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum GSUI drawdown of -71.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and GSUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIG | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -71.60% | +68.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -71.60% | +70.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -52.44% | +51.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility
IBIG vs. GSUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIG | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 106.42% | -103.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.28% | 106.42% | -102.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.28% | 106.42% | -102.14% |
IBIG vs. GSUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUI's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIG vs. GSUI - Dividend Comparison
IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, while GSUI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 3.92% | 4.70% | 4.15% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIG and GSUI have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIG.
IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.00% for GSUI.
IBIG is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while GSUI is Cryptocurrency. IBIG tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIG and 0.00% for GSUI.
Find the right allocation for IBIG and GSUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer