PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHM vs. HYGW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHM vs. HYGW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHM) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBHM

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.73%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

HYGW

1D
0.14%
1M
0.11%
6M
1.81%
YTD
2.36%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$480.97K$636.40K$814.79K
$89.93K$107.48K$111.05K

IBHM vs. HYGW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBHM and HYGW is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHM vs. HYGW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBHM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


HYGW
HYGW Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HYGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGW Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBHM vs. HYGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHM) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBHMHYGWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.57

IBHM vs. HYGW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBHM vs. HYGW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHM drawdown since its inception was -1.67%, smaller than the maximum HYGW drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHM and HYGW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHMHYGWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-5.49%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.21%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-0.59%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

Volatility

IBHM vs. HYGW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHMHYGWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.73%

2.92%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.73%

4.62%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

4.62%

+0.11%

IBHM vs. HYGW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGW's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHM vs. HYGW - Dividend Comparison

IBHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than HYGW's 10.71% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
10.71%12.53%12.30%15.98%8.71%
IBHM
iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHM and HYGW have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBHM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBHM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for HYGW.

HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 10.71%, compared with 1.58% for IBHM.

IBHM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while HYGW is Derivative Income. IBHM tracks Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index, while HYGW tracks Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHM and 0.69% for HYGW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHM and HYGW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer