PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHH vs. HYSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHH vs. HYSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBHH having a 1.66% return and HYSD slightly higher at 1.67%.


IBHH

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.20%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
10Y*

HYSD

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.06%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHH vs. HYSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBHH and HYSD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.77

The correlation between IBHH and HYSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHH vs. HYSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHH
IBHH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IBHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HYSD
HYSD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HYSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHH vs. HYSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBHHHYSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

4.19

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.70

18.19

+3.51

IBHH vs. HYSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHH Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the HYSD Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHH and HYSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBHHHYSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.18

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.71

-0.97

Drawdowns

IBHH vs. HYSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHH drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, which is greater than HYSD's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHH and HYSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHHHYSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.05%

-2.69%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-1.46%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.22%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-0.26%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

0.34%

-0.04%

Volatility

IBHH vs. HYSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) is 0.77%, while Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) has a volatility of 0.97%. This indicates that IBHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHHHYSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.97%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

2.14%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

2.81%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.26%

3.52%

+3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.26%

3.52%

+3.74%

IBHH vs. HYSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYSD's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHH vs. HYSD - Dividend Comparison

IBHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than HYSD's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYSD
Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
5.80%5.60%1.82%0.00%0.00%
IBHH
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.27%6.39%6.93%6.65%5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHH and HYSD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYSD has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to IBHH (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHH dropped -12.05% vs HYSD's -2.69%.

On 1-year performance, IBHH leads with 6.59% vs 6.08% for HYSD. On fees, IBHH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHH has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBHH has performed better with a 6.59% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for HYSD.

IBHH has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 5.80% for HYSD.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Columbia. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHH and 0.44% for HYSD.

IBHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHH and HYSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer