IBHH vs. FLMI
IBHH (iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and FLMI (Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHH is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FLMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. IBHH is passively managed, while FLMI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBHH returned 8.78%/yr vs 5.72%/yr for FLMI. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBHH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLMI.
Performance
IBHH vs. FLMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHH achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than FLMI's 2.47% return.
IBHH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 5.85%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLMI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 6M
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 7.87%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- —
IBHH vs. FLMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.85% | 8.02% | 7.53% | 12.87% | -6.70% |
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF | 2.47% | 5.89% | 4.91% | 7.89% | -5.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHH and FLMI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2022 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHH vs. FLMI — Risk / Return Rank
IBHH
FLMI
IBHH vs. FLMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHH | FLMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.61 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.80 | 2.73 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.19 | 9.81 | +9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHH vs. FLMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHH drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum FLMI drawdown of -14.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHH and FLMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHH | FLMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -14.66% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.22% | -2.90% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | -5.31% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.17% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -2.81% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.80% | -0.49% |
Volatility
IBHH vs. FLMI - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) have volatilities of 0.69% and 0.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHH | FLMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | 0.67% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.11% | 2.06% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79% | 2.93% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 4.43% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 4.71% | +2.51% |
IBHH vs. FLMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMI's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHH vs. FLMI - Dividend Comparison
IBHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than FLMI's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF | 3.87% | 3.89% | 4.08% | 3.71% | 3.08% | 2.22% | 2.09% | 2.71% | 2.41% | 0.34% |
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.25% | 6.39% | 6.93% | 6.65% | 5.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHH and FLMI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBHH has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to FLMI (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHH dropped -12.05% vs FLMI's -14.66%.
On 3-year performance, IBHH leads with 8.78% vs 5.72% for FLMI. On fees, FLMI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IBHH has performed better with a 8.78% return vs 5.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLMI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHH.
IBHH has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 3.87% for FLMI.
IBHH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FLMI is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHH and 0.30% for FLMI.
FLMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHH and FLMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer