IBHH vs. FBND
IBHH (iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHH is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. IBHH is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBHH returned 8.77%/yr vs 4.69%/yr for FBND. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
IBHH vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHH achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.61% return.
IBHH
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 6.01%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBND
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
IBHH vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.83% | 8.02% | 7.53% | 12.87% | -6.70% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.61% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -8.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHH and FBND is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2022 | 0.59 |
The correlation between IBHH and FBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHH vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
IBHH
FBND
IBHH vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHH | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.22 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 1.83 | +3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.71 | 5.27 | +14.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHH vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHH drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHH and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHH | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -17.25% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.22% | -2.66% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | -5.94% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -1.32% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -3.34% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.93% | -0.62% |
Volatility
IBHH vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) is 0.69%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that IBHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHH | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | 1.12% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.11% | 2.85% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80% | 3.83% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 5.93% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 6.10% | +1.12% |
IBHH vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHH vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
IBHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than FBND's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.70% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.25% | 6.39% | 6.93% | 6.65% | 5.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHH and FBND have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBND has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to IBHH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHH dropped -12.05% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 3-year performance, IBHH leads with 8.77% vs 4.69% for FBND. On fees, IBHH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IBHH has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
IBHH has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 4.70% for FBND.
IBHH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHH and 0.36% for FBND.
IBHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHH and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer