IBDW vs. TSCM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IBDW (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF) and TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDW is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index, while TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management. IBDW is passively managed, while TSCM is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSCM.

Performance

IBDW vs. TSCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDW achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than TSCM's 2.68% return.

IBDW

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.45%
• 1Y: 4.46%
• 3Y*: 5.87%
• 5Y*: 0.46%
• 10Y*: —

TSCM

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDW vs. TSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF	0.17%	-0.24%
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF	2.68%	-1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDW and TSCM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

IBDW vs. TSCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDW

IBDW Risk / Return Rank: 40
IBDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IBDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
IBDW Omega Ratio Rank: 37
IBDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
IBDW Martin Ratio Rank: 40

TSCM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDW vs. TSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBDW	TSCM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.88	—	—

Drawdowns

IBDW vs. TSCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDW drawdown since its inception was -23.87%, which is greater than TSCM's maximum drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDW and TSCM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBDW	TSCM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.87%	-14.87%	-9.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-1.52%	+0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.37%	-5.79%	-3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBDW	TSCM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48%	21.15%	-17.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.23%	21.15%	-13.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.23%	21.15%	-13.92%

IBDW vs. TSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCM's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBDW vs. TSCM - Dividend Comparison

IBDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, while TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF	4.79%	4.78%	5.00%	4.50%	3.70%	1.10%
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBDW and TSCM in my portfolio?

IBDW and TSCM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBDW or TSCM?

On fees, IBDW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBDW or TSCM?

IBDW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBDW or TSCM?

IBDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.

What is the main difference between IBDW and TSCM?

IBDW is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while TSCM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and TimesSquare Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDW and 0.55% for TSCM.