PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDW vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDW vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDW achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 53.97% return.


IBDW

1D
0.07%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*

DBE

1D
-0.63%
1M
-16.23%
YTD
53.97%
6M
50.93%
1Y
43.95%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDW vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IBDW
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF
0.17%9.07%2.96%9.40%-17.13%0.36%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
53.97%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%9.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDW and DBE is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

-0.12

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IBDW and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.12 to -0.39, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDW vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDW
IBDW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IBDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDW Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDW Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDW vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBDWDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.07

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.88

6.89

-1.01

IBDW vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDW and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBDW vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDW drawdown since its inception was -23.87%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDW and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDWDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.87%

-86.69%

+62.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.42%

-21.28%

+18.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.61%

-23.89%

+17.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.87%

-38.74%

+14.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-41.55%

+40.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-57.24%

+47.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

6.42%

-5.66%

Volatility

IBDW vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) is 1.00%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that IBDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDWDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

9.37%

-8.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

31.44%

-28.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

35.27%

-31.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

29.58%

-22.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.23%

28.34%

-21.11%

IBDW vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBDW vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

IBDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than DBE's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.51%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
IBDW
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF
4.79%4.78%5.00%4.50%3.70%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDW and DBE have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (9.37%) compared to IBDW (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDW dropped -23.87% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 14.66% vs 0.46% for IBDW. On fees, IBDW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDW has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 0.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBDW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

IBDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 2.51% for DBE.

IBDW is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. IBDW tracks Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDW and 0.78% for DBE.

IBDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDW and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer