PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDT vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDT vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDT achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -3.49% return.


IBDT

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.02%
6M
0.85%
YTD
1.18%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
5.62%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.89%

TLT

1D
-0.66%
1M
-3.81%
6M
-3.46%
YTD
-3.49%
1Y
-2.45%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-8.18%
10Y*
-2.38%
ALL TIME*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.99M$16.78M$15.59M
$2.33B$2.02B$2.19B

IBDT vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBDT
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
1.18%7.02%3.97%7.72%-11.42%-1.90%9.62%15.15%1.47%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-3.49%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%5.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDT and TLT is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.65

The correlation between IBDT and TLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDT vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBDT
IBDT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IBDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBDT vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBDTTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

0.99

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

-0.14

+3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.60

-0.30

+17.90

IBDT vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDT and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBDT vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDT and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDTTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-48.35%

+30.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.03%

-7.74%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.94%

-14.79%

+11.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.61%

-43.70%

+26.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-42.36%

+42.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-13.99%

+9.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

3.57%

-3.35%

Volatility

IBDT vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) is 0.44%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that IBDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDTTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

2.46%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.15%

6.85%

-5.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59%

9.32%

-7.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.03%

15.74%

-10.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.31%

14.83%

-8.52%

IBDT vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDT vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

IBDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than TLT's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBDT
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
4.14%4.56%4.67%4.10%3.25%2.45%2.80%3.32%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.34%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDT and TLT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLT has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to IBDT (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDT dropped -17.79% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 5-year performance, IBDT leads with 1.07% vs -8.18% for TLT. On fees, IBDT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDT has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IBDT has performed better with a 1.07% return vs -8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBDT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 4.14% for IBDT.

IBDT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while TLT is Government Bonds. IBDT tracks Bloomberg December 2028 Maturity Corporate Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDT and 0.15% for TLT.

IBDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDT and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer