IBDR vs. VNAM
IBDR (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF) and VNAM (Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Barclays December 2026 Maturity Corporate Index, while VNAM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBDR returned 5.25%/yr vs 16.14%/yr for VNAM. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDR charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for VNAM.
Performance
IBDR vs. VNAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDR achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than VNAM's 0.40% return.
IBDR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- —
VNAM
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 50.25%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBDR vs. VNAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 1.65% | 4.99% | 4.98% | 5.96% | -8.28% | 0.44% |
VNAM Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF | 0.40% | 67.05% | -7.78% | 12.95% | -44.16% | 2.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDR and VNAM is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021 | 0.06 |
The correlation between IBDR and VNAM shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDR vs. VNAM — Risk / Return Rank
IBDR
VNAM
IBDR vs. VNAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBDR | VNAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +11.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.38 | 1.31 | +2.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 52.75 | 2.96 | +49.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 183.41 | 8.28 | +175.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBDR vs. VNAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDR drawdown since its inception was -16.06%, smaller than the maximum VNAM drawdown of -52.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDR and VNAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDR | VNAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -52.84% | +36.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | -17.03% | +16.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.08% | -31.34% | +30.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.41% | +6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -30.30% | +27.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 6.07% | -6.05% |
Volatility
IBDR vs. VNAM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) is 0.18%, while Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that IBDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDR | VNAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 6.38% | -6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.35% | 19.75% | -19.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 27.10% | -26.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 25.58% | -22.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 25.58% | -20.73% |
IBDR vs. VNAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VNAM's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBDR vs. VNAM - Dividend Comparison
IBDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than VNAM's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 4.13% | 4.20% | 4.13% | 3.41% | 2.44% | 2.11% | 2.61% | 3.25% | 3.56% | 3.22% | 0.86% |
VNAM Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF | 0.49% | 0.50% | 1.00% | 0.49% | 1.04% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDR and VNAM have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNAM has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to IBDR (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDR dropped -16.06% vs VNAM's -52.84%.
On 3-year performance, VNAM leads with 16.14% vs 5.25% for IBDR. On fees, IBDR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VNAM has performed better with a 16.14% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for VNAM.
IBDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.49% for VNAM.
IBDR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VNAM is Emerging Markets Equities. IBDR tracks Barclays December 2026 Maturity Corporate Index, while VNAM tracks MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDR and 0.51% for VNAM.
IBDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.89 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDR and VNAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer