PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDQ vs. FLRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDQ vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBDQ

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLRN

1D
0.03%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.19%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
3.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDQ vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBDQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
0.00%4.13%5.12%5.23%-5.91%-1.49%8.27%13.59%-2.39%6.28%
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
1.87%5.01%6.32%6.54%1.31%0.39%0.77%4.02%1.39%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDQ and FLRN is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDQ vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDQ

FLRN
FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDQ vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBDQ vs. FLRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDQFLRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

Drawdowns

IBDQ vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDQFLRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

Volatility

IBDQ vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDQFLRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

IBDQ vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDQ vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than FLRN's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
4.51%4.89%5.67%5.68%1.95%0.39%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.64%1.06%0.63%
IBDQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
2.08%3.77%3.81%3.27%2.23%2.07%2.51%3.21%3.52%3.28%3.39%2.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDQ and FLRN have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBDQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBDQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLRN.

FLRN has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 2.08% for IBDQ.

IBDQ tracks Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while FLRN tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDQ and 0.15% for FLRN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDQ and FLRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer