PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDQ vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDQ vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBDQ

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
0.81%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.87%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDQ vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBDQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
0.00%4.13%5.12%5.23%-5.91%-1.49%8.27%13.59%-2.39%6.28%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.64%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDQ and DGRO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015

0.02

The correlation between IBDQ and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDQ vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDQ

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDQ vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBDQ vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDQDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

Drawdowns

IBDQ vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDQDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

Volatility

IBDQ vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDQDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

IBDQ vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDQ vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than DGRO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
IBDQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
2.08%3.77%3.81%3.27%2.23%2.07%2.51%3.21%3.52%3.28%3.39%2.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDQ and DGRO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDQ.

IBDQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.94% for DGRO.

IBDQ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IBDQ tracks Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDQ and 0.08% for DGRO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDQ and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer