IBDQ vs. DGRO
IBDQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
IBDQ vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBDQ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
IBDQ vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 0.00% | 4.13% | 5.12% | 5.23% | -5.91% | -1.49% | 8.27% | 13.59% | -2.39% | 6.28% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.64% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDQ and DGRO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015 | 0.02 |
The correlation between IBDQ and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDQ vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
IBDQ
DGRO
IBDQ vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDQ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.77 | — |
Drawdowns
IBDQ vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDQ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.44% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility
IBDQ vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDQ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.49% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 13.82% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.62% | — |
IBDQ vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDQ vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than DGRO's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 2.08% | 3.77% | 3.81% | 3.27% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 3.21% | 3.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDQ and DGRO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDQ.
IBDQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.94% for DGRO.
IBDQ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IBDQ tracks Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDQ and 0.08% for DGRO.
Find the right allocation for IBDQ and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer