PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCI.L vs. INXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCI.L vs. INXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) and iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCI.L achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly higher than INXG.L's -1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.L has outperformed INXG.L with an annualized return of 1.54%, while INXG.L has yielded a comparatively lower -2.20% annualized return.


IBCI.L

1D
0.32%
1M
-2.22%
6M
-0.13%
YTD
-0.01%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
1.51%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
1.54%

INXG.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.09%
6M
-2.90%
YTD
-1.18%
1Y
2.64%
3Y*
-1.20%
5Y*
-9.01%
10Y*
-2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCI.L vs. INXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBCI.L
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-0.01%6.03%-4.55%3.48%-4.33%-0.79%8.45%1.18%-1.05%5.00%
INXG.L
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF
-1.18%1.10%-8.60%0.16%-34.28%4.03%11.12%6.25%-0.49%2.25%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCI.L and INXG.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.31

The correlation between IBCI.L and INXG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCI.L vs. INXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCI.L
IBCI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
IBCI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

INXG.L
INXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
INXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
INXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
INXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
INXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCI.L vs. INXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) and iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCI.LINXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.05

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

0.40

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

0.90

-0.10

IBCI.L vs. INXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is comparable to the INXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCI.L and INXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCI.L vs. INXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCI.L drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum INXG.L drawdown of -50.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.L and INXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCI.LINXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-50.86%

+20.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-6.59%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.28%

-15.06%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.28%

-50.86%

+36.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.53%

-50.86%

+36.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-43.74%

+35.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-12.09%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

2.93%

-1.39%

Volatility

IBCI.L vs. INXG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) is 1.41%, while iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a volatility of 2.44%. This indicates that IBCI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCI.LINXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

2.44%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.72%

7.14%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.90%

9.66%

-4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.49%

20.07%

-8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.76%

17.39%

-5.63%

IBCI.L vs. INXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCI.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than INXG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCI.L vs. INXG.L - Dividend Comparison

IBCI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCI.L
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INXG.L
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF
7.65%7.23%5.77%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.61%1.36%1.95%1.28%0.65%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCI.L and INXG.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCI.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCI.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for INXG.L.

IBCI.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while INXG.L is Government Bonds. IBCI.L tracks BBG Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (EUR), while INXG.L tracks Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IBCI.L and 0.10% for INXG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCI.L and INXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer