IBBQ vs. XLVI
IBBQ (Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) and XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBBQ is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ / Biotechnology, while XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. IBBQ is passively managed, while XLVI is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBBQ charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLVI.
Performance
IBBQ vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBBQ achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly higher than XLVI's -0.67% return.
IBBQ
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 39.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLVI
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBBQ vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 1.91% | 27.41% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -0.67% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBBQ and XLVI is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.69 |
IBBQ vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBBQ
XLVI
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IBBQ
XLVI
-
Financial Services
IBBQ
XLVI
Basic Materials
IBBQ
-
XLVI
-
Communication Services
IBBQ
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBBQ
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Defensive
IBBQ
-
XLVI
-
Energy
IBBQ
-
XLVI
-
Industrials
IBBQ
-
XLVI
-
Real Estate
IBBQ
-
XLVI
-
Technology
IBBQ
-
XLVI
-
Utilities
IBBQ
-
XLVI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBBQ vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank
IBBQ
XLVI
IBBQ vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBBQ | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.68 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBBQ | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 1.33 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
IBBQ vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBBQ drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBBQ and XLVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBBQ | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.94% | -8.14% | -29.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.17% | -4.02% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.82% | -1.95% | -14.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | — | — |
Volatility
IBBQ vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBBQ | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 10.94% | +8.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.86% | 10.94% | +10.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.86% | 10.94% | +10.92% |
IBBQ vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBBQ has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBBQ vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison
IBBQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than XLVI's 11.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.87% | 0.90% | 1.14% | 0.81% | 0.76% | 0.63% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.53% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBBQ and XLVI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBBQ is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBBQ is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLVI.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 0.87% for IBBQ.
IBBQ is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for IBBQ and 0.35% for XLVI.
Find the right allocation for IBBQ and XLVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer