PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBB vs. GERM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBB vs. GERM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBB

1D
0.62%
1M
5.52%
YTD
5.61%
6M
3.57%
1Y
42.90%
3Y*
11.80%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
8.21%

GERM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBB vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBB
iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
5.61%27.98%-8.52%
GERM
Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

IBB vs. GERM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IBB
GERM

Healthcare

100.0%
99.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.4%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IBB
100.0%
GERM
99.3%

Basic Materials

IBB

-

GERM

-

Communication Services

IBB

-

GERM

-

Consumer Cyclical

IBB

-

GERM

-

Consumer Defensive

IBB

-

GERM

-

Energy

IBB

-

GERM

-

Financial Services

IBB

-

GERM
0.4%

Industrials

IBB

-

GERM

-

Real Estate

IBB

-

GERM

-

Technology

IBB

-

GERM

-

Utilities

IBB

-

GERM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBB vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBB
IBB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GERM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBB vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBBGERMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

IBB vs. GERM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBB vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBB drawdown since its inception was -62.85%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBB and GERM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBBGERMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.85%

0.00%

-62.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

0.00%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

0.00%

-21.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

0.00%

+3.12%

Volatility

IBB vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that IBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBBGERMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

0.00%

+6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.98%

0.00%

+15.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.34%

0.00%

+20.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.03%

0.00%

+22.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

0.00%

+23.17%

IBB vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBB has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GERM's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBB vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison

IBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GERM
Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBB
iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
0.23%0.23%0.29%0.26%0.31%0.21%0.21%0.33%0.20%0.30%0.19%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBB has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBB dropped -62.85% vs GERM's 0.00%.

On 1-year performance, IBB leads with 42.90% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, IBB is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBB has performed better with a 42.90% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBB is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.

IBB has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.

IBB tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index, while GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBB and 0.68% for GERM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBB and GERM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer