PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBB vs. ARKG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBB vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBB achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly lower than ARKG's 17.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IBB has underperformed ARKG with an annualized return of 6.03%, while ARKG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.24% annualized return.


IBB

1D
-3.01%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
-2.60%
6M
-2.75%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
6.03%

ARKG

1D
-2.16%
1M
12.21%
YTD
17.36%
6M
14.32%
1Y
57.12%
3Y*
0.75%
5Y*
-15.45%
10Y*
7.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBB vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBB
iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
-2.60%27.98%-2.41%3.76%-13.69%0.95%26.01%25.42%-9.53%21.08%
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF
17.36%23.04%-28.24%16.22%-53.90%-33.92%180.40%44.00%-1.26%46.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IBB and ARKG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2014

0.78

The correlation between IBB and ARKG shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IBB vs. ARKG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IBB
ARKG

Healthcare

100.0%
99.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IBB
100.0%
ARKG
99.2%

Basic Materials

IBB

-

ARKG

-

Communication Services

IBB

-

ARKG

-

Consumer Cyclical

IBB

-

ARKG

-

Consumer Defensive

IBB

-

ARKG

-

Energy

IBB

-

ARKG

-

Financial Services

IBB

-

ARKG
0.5%

Industrials

IBB

-

ARKG

-

Real Estate

IBB

-

ARKG

-

Technology

IBB

-

ARKG

-

Utilities

IBB

-

ARKG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBB vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBB
IBB Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBB Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKG
ARKG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ARKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBB vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBBARKGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

1.40

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

2.08

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

2.27

+1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.74

5.46

+6.28

IBB vs. ARKG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the ARKG Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBB and ARKG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBBARKGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.40

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

-0.34

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.18

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.13

+0.12

Drawdowns

IBB vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBB drawdown since its inception was -62.85%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBB and ARKG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBBARKGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.85%

-83.59%

+20.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-27.51%

+17.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.85%

-51.96%

+27.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.82%

-80.18%

+40.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-83.59%

+43.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.46%

-69.58%

+62.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.18%

-35.86%

+14.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

11.46%

-8.45%

Volatility

IBB vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) is 6.79%, while ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that IBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBBARKGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

11.89%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.40%

29.12%

-13.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.86%

41.24%

-21.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

45.62%

-23.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.22%

41.13%

-17.91%

IBB vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBB has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBB vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison

IBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%0.85%3.14%0.82%1.34%0.00%0.00%
IBB
iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
0.24%0.23%0.29%0.26%0.31%0.21%0.21%0.33%0.20%0.30%0.19%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBB and ARKG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKG has higher volatility (11.89%) compared to IBB (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBB dropped -62.85% vs ARKG's -83.59%.

On 10-year performance, ARKG leads with 7.24% vs 6.03% for IBB. On fees, IBB is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IBB has been the lower-risk option at 6.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKG has performed better with a 7.24% return vs 6.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBB is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.

IBB has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for ARKG.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBB and 0.75% for ARKG.

IBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBB and ARKG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer