IBB vs. BBH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IBB (iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) and BBH (VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IBB tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index while BBH tracks the MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBB returned 8.14%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for BBH. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBB charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BBH.

Performance

IBB vs. BBH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBB achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than BBH's 0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IBB has outperformed BBH with an annualized return of 8.14%, while BBH has yielded a comparatively lower 7.19% annualized return.

IBB

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: 4.88%
• YTD: 4.97%
• 6M: 2.54%
• 1Y: 41.38%
• 3Y*: 11.58%
• 5Y*: 2.25%
• 10Y*: 8.14%

BBH

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 6M: -1.66%
• 1Y: 24.78%
• 3Y*: 7.06%
• 5Y*: -0.40%
• 10Y*: 7.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBB vs. BBH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF	4.97%	27.98%	-2.41%	3.76%	-13.69%	0.95%	26.01%	25.42%	-9.53%	21.08%
BBH VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF	0.06%	21.18%	-4.29%	3.94%	-15.25%	11.81%	22.13%	26.34%	-10.70%	16.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IBB and BBH is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2001	0.91

The correlation between IBB and BBH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IBB vs. BBH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBB	BBH
Healthcare	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IBB vs. BBH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBB

IBB Risk / Return Rank: 69
IBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
IBB Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
IBB Martin Ratio Rank: 73

BBH

BBH Risk / Return Rank: 39
BBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BBH Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BBH Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBB vs. BBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBB	BBH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.29	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	1.93	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.23	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	2.36	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.28	5.69	+7.59

IBB vs. BBH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBB Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the BBH Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBB and BBH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBB vs. BBH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBB drawdown since its inception was -62.85%, smaller than the maximum BBH drawdown of -72.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBB and BBH.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBB	BBH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.85%	-72.70%	+9.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-10.55%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.85%	-22.74%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.82%	-39.86%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.82%	-39.86%	+0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-12.14%	+11.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.15%	-20.73%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	4.36%	-1.24%

Volatility

IBB vs. BBH - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) at 6.13%. This indicates that IBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBB	BBH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.96%	6.13%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.99%	14.61%	+1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.37%	19.33%	+1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.03%	21.44%	+0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.22%	22.17%	+1.05%

IBB vs. BBH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBB has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than BBH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBB vs. BBH - Dividend Comparison

IBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than BBH's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBH VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF	0.51%	0.51%	0.80%	0.43%	0.47%	0.21%	0.36%	0.34%	0.50%	0.55%	0.30%	0.27%
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF	0.23%	0.23%	0.29%	0.26%	0.31%	0.21%	0.21%	0.33%	0.20%	0.30%	0.19%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBB and BBH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, IBB and BBH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IBB or BBH?

IBB has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to BBH (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBB dropped -62.85% vs BBH's -72.70%.

Which ETF is better, IBB or BBH?

On 10-year performance, IBB leads with 8.14% vs 7.19% for BBH. On fees, BBH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BBH has been the lower-risk option at 6.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBB or BBH?

Over the 10-year period, IBB has performed better with a 8.14% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBB or BBH?

BBH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBB or BBH?

BBH has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.23% for IBB.

What is the main difference between IBB and BBH?

IBB tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index, while BBH tracks MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBB and 0.35% for BBH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.