PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBB vs. CANC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBB vs. CANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBB vs. CANC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IBB
iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
0.12%27.98%-2.41%3.76%-13.69%-5.58%
CANC
Tema Oncology ETF
5.69%42.92%-5.37%510.51%-85.34%-51.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBB achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than CANC's 5.69% return.


IBB

1D
4.32%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
0.12%
6M
17.17%
1Y
32.33%
3Y*
9.65%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
6.84%

CANC

1D
4.66%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
5.69%
6M
27.93%
1Y
52.46%
3Y*
140.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBB vs. CANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBB has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than CANC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBB vs. CANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBB
IBB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CANC
CANC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBB vs. CANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBBCANCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

1.94

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

2.59

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.86

-1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.61

13.76

-5.15

IBB vs. CANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the CANC Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBB and CANC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBBCANCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.94

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-0.04

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between IBB and CANC is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IBB vs. CANC - Dividend Comparison

IBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than CANC's 0.05% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBB
iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
0.23%0.23%0.29%0.26%0.31%0.21%0.21%0.33%0.20%0.30%0.19%0.03%
CANC
Tema Oncology ETF
0.05%0.06%3.00%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBB vs. CANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBB drawdown since its inception was -62.85%, smaller than the maximum CANC drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBB and CANC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBBCANCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.85%

-97.53%

+34.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-12.40%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.88%

-56.19%

+51.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-73.91%

+52.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

3.61%

-0.14%

Volatility

IBB vs. CANC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) have volatilities of 8.62% and 8.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBBCANCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

8.36%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

16.34%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.08%

27.24%

-3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

285.66%

-263.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.37%

285.66%

-262.29%