IASH.L vs. IUIT.L
IASH.L (iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IASH.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IASH.L returned 7.12%/yr vs 27.67%/yr for IUIT.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IASH.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.
Performance
IASH.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IASH.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IASH.L achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IASH.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 7.12%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.67% annualized return.
IASH.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- 1Y
- 38.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
IUIT.L
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 18.21%
- YTD
- 26.17%
- 6M
- 24.98%
- 1Y
- 57.16%
- 3Y*
- 32.13%
- 5Y*
- 26.05%
- 10Y*
- 27.67%
IASH.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IASH.L iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD | 9.51% | 17.67% | 12.92% | -18.83% | -17.27% | 4.48% | 37.65% | 29.94% | -21.35% | 17.95% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 26.17% | 14.17% | 40.92% | 51.48% | -20.73% | 35.36% | 38.94% | 43.23% | 4.43% | 25.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IASH.L and IUIT.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2015 | 0.27 |
The correlation between IASH.L and IUIT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IASH.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IASH.L
IUIT.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IASH.L
IUIT.L
Financial Services
IASH.L
IUIT.L
-
Industrials
IASH.L
IUIT.L
Basic Materials
IASH.L
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IASH.L
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IASH.L
IUIT.L
-
Healthcare
IASH.L
IUIT.L
-
Utilities
IASH.L
IUIT.L
-
Energy
IASH.L
IUIT.L
Communication Services
IASH.L
IUIT.L
-
Real Estate
IASH.L
IUIT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IASH.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
IASH.L
IUIT.L
IASH.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IASH.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.46 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.73 | 3.35 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.80 | 8.51 | +7.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IASH.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.81 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 1.14 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 1.26 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 1.24 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
IASH.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IASH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.39%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASH.L and IUIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IASH.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.39% | -28.01% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.72% | -16.96% | +10.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.77% | -28.01% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.23% | -28.01% | -14.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.67% | -28.01% | -16.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.06% | -0.78% | -9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -5.29% | -19.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 6.70% | -4.26% |
Volatility
IASH.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) is 5.69%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that IASH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IASH.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 7.14% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 15.20% | -4.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 20.31% | -4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 22.82% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 22.51% | +0.28% |
IASH.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IASH.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IASH.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IASH.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IASH.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IASH.L.
IASH.L is categorized as China Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. IASH.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IASH.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.
Find the right allocation for IASH.L and IUIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer