IASH.L vs. HSTC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) and HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L).
IASH.L and HSTC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IASH.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. HSTC.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Dec 9, 2020. Both IASH.L and HSTC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IASH.L vs. HSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IASH.L vs. HSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IASH.L iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD | 0.61% | 17.67% | 12.92% | -18.83% | -17.27% | 4.48% | 3.09% |
HSTC.L HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF | -13.50% | 16.17% | 21.37% | -13.38% | -19.39% | -31.98% | 1.62% |
Different Trading Currencies
IASH.L is traded in GBp, while HSTC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSTC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IASH.L achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than HSTC.L's -13.50% return.
IASH.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 22.00%
- 3Y*
- 2.27%
- 5Y*
- -0.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.38%
HSTC.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -25.79%
- 1Y
- -14.95%
- 3Y*
- 1.33%
- 5Y*
- -10.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IASH.L vs. HSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IASH.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HSTC.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IASH.L vs. HSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
IASH.L
HSTC.L
IASH.L vs. HSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) and HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IASH.L | HSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | -0.53 | +1.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | -0.60 | +2.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.93 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | -0.48 | +3.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | -1.07 | +9.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IASH.L | HSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | -0.53 | +1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | -0.27 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | -0.25 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between IASH.L and HSTC.L is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IASH.L vs. HSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IASH.L nor HSTC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IASH.L vs. HSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IASH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.39%, smaller than the maximum HSTC.L drawdown of -69.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASH.L and HSTC.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IASH.L | HSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.39% | -69.93% | +21.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -29.27% | +20.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.23% | -62.13% | +19.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.38% | -54.29% | +36.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.91% | -49.96% | +25.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 13.03% | -10.37% |
Volatility
IASH.L vs. HSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) is 4.88%, while HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that IASH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IASH.L | HSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 7.84% | -2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 17.93% | -6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 27.88% | -11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 37.86% | -16.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 37.87% | -14.96% |