IASH.L vs. EMIM.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L).
IASH.L and EMIM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IASH.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. EMIM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both IASH.L and EMIM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IASH.L or EMIM.L.
Correlation
The correlation between IASH.L and EMIM.L is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IASH.L vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IASH.L:
0.56
EMIM.L:
0.88
IASH.L:
1.03
EMIM.L:
1.30
IASH.L:
1.14
EMIM.L:
1.16
IASH.L:
0.35
EMIM.L:
0.82
IASH.L:
1.38
EMIM.L:
3.49
IASH.L:
11.34%
EMIM.L:
3.18%
IASH.L:
27.70%
EMIM.L:
12.55%
IASH.L:
-49.29%
EMIM.L:
-31.70%
IASH.L:
-29.06%
EMIM.L:
-2.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IASH.L achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than EMIM.L's 3.14% return.
IASH.L
1.65%
2.82%
19.66%
17.48%
2.20%
N/A
EMIM.L
3.14%
1.85%
4.40%
11.98%
4.13%
5.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IASH.L vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IASH.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IASH.L vs. EMIM.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IASH.L
EMIM.L
IASH.L vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IASH.L vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IASH.L nor EMIM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IASH.L vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IASH.L drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, which is greater than EMIM.L's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASH.L and EMIM.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IASH.L vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) at 3.67%. This indicates that IASH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.