IASH.L vs. CNYA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).
IASH.L and CNYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IASH.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. Both IASH.L and CNYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IASH.L or CNYA.
Correlation
The correlation between IASH.L and CNYA is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IASH.L vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IASH.L:
0.64
CNYA:
0.51
IASH.L:
1.14
CNYA:
0.94
IASH.L:
1.16
CNYA:
1.15
IASH.L:
0.40
CNYA:
0.34
IASH.L:
1.58
CNYA:
1.11
IASH.L:
11.26%
CNYA:
14.80%
IASH.L:
27.64%
CNYA:
32.49%
IASH.L:
-49.29%
CNYA:
-49.48%
IASH.L:
-29.20%
CNYA:
-36.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IASH.L achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA's 0.78% return.
IASH.L
1.44%
4.44%
19.61%
17.63%
2.16%
N/A
CNYA
0.78%
6.67%
15.97%
15.87%
1.21%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IASH.L vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IASH.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IASH.L vs. CNYA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IASH.L
CNYA
IASH.L vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IASH.L vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
IASH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IASH.L iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 2.49% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.98% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
IASH.L vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IASH.L drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, roughly equal to the maximum CNYA drawdown of -49.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASH.L and CNYA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IASH.L vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 4.07%. This indicates that IASH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.