IUIT.L vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
IUIT.L and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUIT.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both IUIT.L and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUIT.L or VGT.
Performance
IUIT.L vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUIT.L achieves a 32.97% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 25.23% return.
IUIT.L
32.97%
-0.54%
15.43%
40.07%
24.65%
N/A
VGT
25.23%
0.64%
13.55%
33.20%
21.96%
20.52%
Key characteristics
| IUIT.L | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.87 | 1.60 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.50 | 2.11 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.63 | 2.20 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.77 | 7.92 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.39% | 4.23% |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.61% | 20.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.46% | -54.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.60% | -3.62% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUIT.L vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUIT.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between IUIT.L and VGT is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUIT.L vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUIT.L vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
IUIT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.62% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.12% | 1.05% |
Drawdowns
IUIT.L vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUIT.L drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIT.L and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUIT.L vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) is 6.03%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that IUIT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.