IAK vs. XMMO
IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAK returned 12.67%/yr vs 19.95%/yr for XMMO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAK charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
IAK vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAK achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 22.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IAK has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 12.67%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.95% annualized return.
IAK
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 36.63%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
IAK vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 1.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.48% | 14.18% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.77% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAK and XMMO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IAK and XMMO has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IAK vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAK
XMMO
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IAK
XMMO
Healthcare
IAK
XMMO
Basic Materials
IAK
-
XMMO
Communication Services
IAK
-
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
IAK
-
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
IAK
-
XMMO
Energy
IAK
-
XMMO
Industrials
IAK
-
XMMO
Real Estate
IAK
-
XMMO
Technology
IAK
-
XMMO
Utilities
IAK
-
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAK vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
IAK
XMMO
IAK vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAK | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.33 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 4.41 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 17.54 | -16.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAK vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAK drawdown since its inception was -77.38%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAK and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAK | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.38% | -55.37% | -22.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -8.34% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | -24.93% | +13.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | -27.91% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.95% | -36.74% | -8.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -1.19% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -9.44% | -6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 2.09% | +1.32% |
Volatility
IAK vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) is 5.49%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that IAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAK | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 9.07% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 16.76% | -6.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 19.74% | -4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 21.62% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 22.35% | -1.43% |
IAK vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAK has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAK vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than XMMO's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.60% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAK and XMMO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to IAK (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAK dropped -77.38% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.95% vs 12.67% for IAK. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IAK.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.61% for XMMO.
IAK is categorized as Financials Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IAK and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAK and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer