IAG vs. GIB
IAG (IAMGOLD Corporation) and GIB (CGI Inc) are both stocks. IAG operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while GIB operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 10 years, IAG returned 10.35%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for GIB. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
IAG vs. GIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAG achieves a -13.95% return, which is significantly higher than GIB's -20.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IAG has outperformed GIB with an annualized return of 10.35%, while GIB has yielded a comparatively lower 4.25% annualized return.
IAG
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -10.02%
- 6M
- -21.95%
- YTD
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- 109.91%
- 3Y*
- 76.06%
- 5Y*
- 38.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.33%
GIB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 11.73%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- YTD
- -20.45%
- 1Y
- -23.67%
- 3Y*
- -9.95%
- 5Y*
- -4.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | $41.80M | $36.08M | $33.67M |
| $76.33M | $73.71M | $89.43M |
IAG vs. GIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | -13.95% | 219.57% | 103.95% | -1.94% | -17.57% | -14.71% | -1.61% | 1.36% | -36.88% | 51.43% |
GIB CGI Inc | -20.45% | -15.19% | 2.07% | 24.47% | -2.68% | 11.59% | -5.26% | 36.80% | 12.63% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAG and GIB is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2003 | 0.15 |
The correlation between IAG and GIB shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IAG:
$8.20B
GIB:
$15.64B
IAG:
$1.73
GIB:
CA$7.71
IAG:
8.22
GIB:
13.29
IAG:
0.05
GIB:
1.67
IAG:
2.43
GIB:
1.36
IAG:
1.94
GIB:
2.18
IAG:
$3.42B
GIB:
CA$16.35B
IAG:
$1.64B
GIB:
CA$3.35B
IAG:
$1.97B
GIB:
CA$2.98B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAG vs. GIB — Risk / Return Rank
IAG
GIB
IAG vs. GIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and CGI Inc (GIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAG | GIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.87 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | -0.65 | +3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | -1.16 | +6.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAG vs. GIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAG drawdown since its inception was -95.55%, which is greater than GIB's maximum drawdown of -86.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG and GIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAG | GIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.55% | -86.78% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.30% | -36.77% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.30% | -49.54% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.69% | -49.54% | -24.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.46% | -49.54% | -36.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.25% | -39.76% | -2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.07% | -32.55% | -23.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.61% | 20.44% | +0.17% |
Volatility
IAG vs. GIB - Volatility Comparison
IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to CGI Inc (GIB) at 10.64%. This indicates that IAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAG | GIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.14% | 10.64% | +4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.40% | 26.97% | +21.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.98% | 30.79% | +32.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.60% | 23.49% | +37.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.53% | 22.76% | +35.77% |
Dividends
IAG vs. GIB - Dividend Comparison
IAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | 0.65% | 0.48% | 0.10% |
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
IAG vs. GIB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IAMGOLD Corporation and CGI Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IAG vs. GIB - Profitability Comparison
IAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.
GIB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a gross profit of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
IAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.
GIB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported an operating income of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
IAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.
GIB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a net income of 445.87M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IAG and GIB have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAG has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to GIB (10.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAG dropped -95.55% vs GIB's -86.78%.
IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAG and GIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer